All orders placed between December 24 through January 4 will ship on January 5th. Our offices will be closed during this time.
The Aerosolv unit threads directly to the 2” bung of any 30- to 55-gallon drum. The filter is installed on the 3/4” bung. Insert the aerosol can (inverted) into the Aerosolv housing. Lower the sliding cap and lock into place. Push handle down firmly until completely depressed and hold in place while can releases initial pressure and contents. Allow the contents of the can to drain into the collection drum (about 20 seconds).
ALWAYS OPERATE AEROSOLV SYSTEM OUTDOORS OR IN A WELL VENTILATED AREA.
No, all industry standard drums have 2” openings. However, Aerosolv should not be installed on a drum smaller than 20-gallon capacity to allow proper displacement of compressed gas released during puncturing.
It only takes 15-20 seconds for the can to be depleted after puncturing. One Aerosolv customer has punctured as many as 500 on a one-man seven hour shift.
The system is designed to puncture any industry standard aerosol can, regardless of length. Special gaskets are available for smaller diameter cans.
Periodic maintenance should include: replacement of gasket which is installed inside the unit that provides a seal against the can and cleaning/lubricating the puncture pin will enhance the unit longevity.
Generally, four aerosol cans equal one pound of steel. American industry consumes 3 billion aerosol cans per year, amounting to 375,000 tons of steel.
Yes, if chlorinated and non-chlorinated liquids are collected into separate drums. Chlorinated liquids (primarily solvents) can be recycled in-house as “parts cleaning solvent”; non-chlorinated liquids (primarily paints) can be reclaimed. Either method may qualify for “waste minimization credit”.
Yes, caustics (such as oven cleaners) and pesticides or insecticides should not be collected into a drum with other liquid residuals. They can, however be collected into segregated single-content drums designated “pesticides only”, “insecticides only”, or “caustics only”. Also, white metals-typically labeled as “cold galvanized” should be separated and not co-mingled with any other aerosol residuals.
Approximately 4,200 cans can be punctured before the drum is at maximum recommended capacity. The drum should not be filled more than 75% full, to provide proper displacement for released contents.
Simply call the waste handler who is handling your other hazardous waste and manifest according to collected contents.
A waste profile of a “worst-case” scenario, whereby all known aerosol residuals are listed, excluding pesticides and insecticides, is available. Reputable waste handlers should accept this profile for co-mingled residuals, thus avoiding the expense of profiling the drum.
Not every material listed on the Waste Profile will be present in the drum. However, the collected residuals in any combination, will not exceed the percentages listed, which are the maximum percentages found in any industrial aerosol product (excluding pesticides, insecticides and caustics).
Yes, but not because of the primary product they contain. Spent aerosol cans would be considered empty, and therefore exempt from regulation, were it not for the fact that the propellant compressed gas is reactive to heat and is still present in an empty can (40 CFR 261.23 (a) (6)).
No, however, according to the EPA's Office of Solid Waste: a steel aerosol can that does not contain a significant amount of liquid (e.g., a can that has been punctured and drained) would meet the definition of scrap metal (40 CFR 261.1(c) (6)), and, if it is to be recycled, would be exempt from regulation under 40 CFR 261.6(a) (3) (iv). Scrap metal that is recycled is exempt from RCRA regulation under this provision even if it is hazardous waste, so generators need not make a hazardous waste determination.
A Hazardous Waste handler will charge from $275 to $350 per 55-gallon drum for proper transportation and recycling, reclamation and/or disposal. This represents the total disposal cost for the residual liquids of 4,200 spent aerosol cans. This compares to solid waste disposal cost for the residual liquids of 4,200 spent aerosol cans. This compares to solid waste disposal cost of unpunctured aerosol cans of $650 to $1,200 per 96 cans! On a direct comparison of 4,200 spent cans, the cost saving with Aerosolv ranges from $28,000 to $52,000.
It is composed of two parts: a coalescing lower portion and an activated carbon upper portion. The coalescing portion collects microscopic airborne liquids from the gas and combines them into droplets which collect within the filter chamber. The activated carbon adsorbs hydrocarbons and removes odor from the “dry” gas which has passed through the coalescing portion. It effectively reduces VOC’s from the escaping gas, resulting in total hydrocarbon emissions 75% less than the 300 ppm desired limitations.
The compressed gas seeks escape through the point of least resistance, which is the filter. However, a minimal amount of gas may remain in the drum. By leaving the “last” can punctured within the Aerosolv housing until puncturing is resumed, an effective prolonged seal can be maintained.
The filter relieves at 3 psi, eliminating the possibility of unsafe pressure within the drum. Additionally, the activated carbon portion of the filter has been designed to serve as a highly efficient flame arrestor.
Filter life is 9 months or 2,250 cans with changing the Carbon Cartridge (upper portion) twice; cartridge life is 3 months or 750 cans; more frequent change-outs may be necessary based on use. The activated carbon will meet its maximum adsorption at this time and require replacement.
The filter is designed to allow draining prior to disposal. If drained, the filter would stay below the 3% by weight EPA allows for non-regulated disposal. To drain the filter, locate drain valve at bottom edge. Remove drain valve cover while holding filter over Aerosolv housing. Drain filter through housing directly in to drum.
No, permitting is only required when processing 15 pounds or more per day, which is not the case with the Aerosolv system. Permitting generally applies to gas-filling facilities: welding gases, large gas cylinders, etc.
In many cases, there is an OSHA requirement for grounding of “vessels” to prevent any build-up of the static electricity being transferred to a drum. The anti-static wire grounds the drum and the Aerosolv unit simultaneously. The Aerosolv system itself is not capable of generating a static charge. It is non-powered and utilizes a non-sparking puncture pin.